Friday, April 27, 2012

Secret Service Scandals and New Code of Conduct

     The Secret Service Agency was created in 1865 in response to growing concerns of the counterfeit currency industry.  As the agency grew, so did their responsibilities.  They investigated major cases of fraudulent activities against the government and the activities of the Klu Klux Klan.  In 1894, they offered bodyguard services to President Cleveland.  From 1901 to 1902, the S.S. is assigned full-time bodyguard services of the President following the assassination of President William McKinley.  In 1908, protection to the President-elect is afforded.  From 1913 onwards, the S.S. rapidly expanded to include protection of the President's immediate family, the vice president, and former presidents and their families.  A Police force was formed for the White House under the supervision of the S.S.  After the assassination of Kennedy, this was further expanded to include major presidential and vice presidential candidates and nominees.  As decades pass, foreign leaders and dignitaries are afforded protection (http://www.secretservice.gov/history.shtml).

     According to its website, the vision statement of the S.S. is as follows:

The vision of the United States Secret Service is to uphold the tradition of excellence in its investigative and protective mission through a dedicated, highly-trained, diverse, partner-oriented workforce that employs progressive technology and promotes professionalism.

     This vision statement was grossly violated by a group of Secret Service members who tarnished the image of an otherwise outstanding agency with a proud history of excellence and professionalism.  To add insult to injury, the agents responsible for this violation are the ones responsible for safeguarding our President.  Moreover, this took place in a South American country during a trip wherein the President wanted to improve diplomatic and economic relations with South America.  Members of the S.S. have been allegedly consorting with prostitutes and indulging in heavy drinking in their hotels while awaiting the President's arrival.  The Secret Service scandal has all the elements of a Hollywood movie; national security, federal agents, politics, alcohol, sex, exotic tropical settings, everything for that perfect shoot.

     Though it is understood that we all make mistakes, however, when the mistakes involve national security and jeopardize the safekeeping of our President, the situation calls for tough actions.  Just today, news agencies report that a new code of conduct has been issued for the Secret Service including mandatory ethics training, a ban on attending "non-reputable establishments" like strip clubs, and a requirement that no foreign nationals enter a hotel room.  In terms of alcohol, it may only be consumed in moderate amounts while off duty on-assignment and a new 10-hour sobriety rule will be instated. Previously, employees were not able to drink 6 hours before a shift started.  In addition to that, all S.S. employees are to abide by the laws of the U.S. even in foreign countries in order to eliminate objections that prostitution is legal in certain host countries.

     After reading the 'new' code of conduct, one wonders why this was not already in place?  

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Reply to "So you want health care like in Canada? They can't even pronounce their letter "O""


While browsing through my classmates’ blogs to look for an interesting blog to comment on, I came across a blog titled Getting Personal With My Government with an article titled So you want health care like in Canada? They can't even pronounce their letter "O".  First of all, what piqued my interest the most was: What would pronouncing the letter “O” have to do with healthcare?  As I read on, I thought that Canada being a developed country as it is, and many other developed countries in Europe that also have universal healthcare, must have some degree of legitimacy in their decision to offer universal healthcare.  After all, they all are democratic countries.  The majority of the citizens like it and prefer it, otherwise it wouldn’t be there.  So how can such a large number of people and countries choose something so absurd?   
So, I did some research on the comparison between Canada’s healthcare and the U.S.’, and boy was I in for a surprise.  Though both sides have valid arguments, the author of the above-mentioned blog overlooked some key issues in her argument in favor of privatized healthcare.  In an article titled Battle of Health Care Systems: Canada vs. United States written by Nicole Callsen, here is what I found:

1.       49 million Americans have no insurance.
2.       The U.S. is the only developed country where its citizens can become bankrupt due to healthcare costs.
3.       Some 700,000 American citizens go bankrupt every year due to their inability to pay medical bills.
4.       In 2006, some 19% of Americans under the age of 65 did not seek medical treatment due to the heavy costs of medical care.
5.       Canada’s population is overall healthier.
6.       The life expectancy rates of both males and females are higher in Canada: the men’s rate is 77.4 years, and the women’s life expectancy is 82.4 years. On the other hand, the United States’ rate for men is 74.8 years and for women it is 80.1 years (Healthcare Care System Grudge Match, October 2007).
7.       Fewer Canadians are obese and fewer have heart and other health related diseases.
8.       Canada spends less than 10% of its GDP on healthcare, while the U.S. spends 15%, and still 700,000 Americans suffer bankruptcy due to healthcare costs.

         Callsen states that though the U.S. is technologically more advanced than Canada in medicine and healthcare, only the wealthy are able to benefit from it.  One Ipsos poll concluded that Canada leads on affordability and access while the U.S. is ahead on availability.
My question to the author of this blog is: Do we just ignore the 49 million uninsured Americans?

Works Cited
O’Neill, June, O’Neill, Dave. “Health Care System Grudge Match: Canada vs. U.S.” Oct. 2007. Web. Healthcare—economist.com
Callse, Nicole. Battle of Health Care Systems: Canada vs. United States. Retrieved April 12, 2012 from http://www.interesting-health-facts.com/2010/01/battle-of-health-care-systems-canada-vs.html
U.S. vs. Canadian Healthcare: Poll Compares Citizens’ Experience as Patients. Retrieved April 12, 2012 from http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=4467